Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
    Users Online: 304
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 75-79

Human gingival response to methacrylate and silorane-based composite restoratives


1 Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, College of Dentistry, Abha, Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, College of Dentistry, Abha, Saudi Arabia; Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
3 Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, College of Dentistry, Abha Saudi Arabia; Department of Conservative Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
4 Department of Oral Pathology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
5 Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Texas A and M University, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, USA

Correspondence Address:
Khalid M Abdelaziz
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, PO Box 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2278-0521.134853

Rights and Permissions

Objective: The clinical acceptance of restorative material normally depends on its biological safety. This in vivo study considered the clinical and histological gingival response to methacrylate and silorane-based composites. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with sub-gingival tooth defects were treated in two groups (n = 30) with Tetric N-Ceram and Filtek P90 composite restoratives with minimal finishing procedures. An additional 10 patients with pre-existing gingival inflammation and no cervical tooth defects served as control. The gingiva in contact was assessed clinically and histologically at 2, 4 and 8 week intervals. Results: A significant time-dependent gingival response was noted in both test groups (t-test, P < 0.05). Inflammatory cell infiltrates, cellular degeneration, epithelial hyperplasia, keratinization, and erosion were found in selected gingival biopsies. Conclusion: The results confirmed that minimally finished subgingival composite restorations contribute to significant histopathological changes to the contacting gingival tissues. However, the silorane-based composite elicited less severe gingival inflammatory symptoms in comparison to the methacrylate-based resin system.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3685    
    Printed156    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded261    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal