Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
    Users Online: 316
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 133-136

Reliability of two dental age estimation methods in children and comparison with their chronological age


1 Department of Basic and Preventive Sciences, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Yasser R Souror
Head of Basic and Preventive Sciences Department, Batterjee Medical College; P.O. Box 6231, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia; Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine. Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, P.O Box 71511, Egypt

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_114_19

Rights and Permissions

Background: Dental age estimation is being performed since Demirjian proposed dental maturity scores. Subsequently, numerous methods were proposed and were estimated worldwide. Although these methods showed high degrees of reliability, ethnic differences were found to affect the accuracy of the dental age. Objectives: The present study evaluated the relationship between chronological age and dental age using Demirjian and Willems methods in children using digital panoramic radiographs. Materials and Methods: Dental age of 60 digital panoramic radiographs of children (males: 34, females: 26) were calculated using the Demirjian scoring method and Willems scoring method. These age values were compared among themselves as well as with chronological age of the children. Further, the comparison was made by dividing all children in the age ranges of 5-7, 7.1-9, 9.1-11, and 11.1-13 years. The correlations between ages among all parameters were statistically significant except age groups 9.1-11 and 11.1-13 years. Conclusion: A significant correlation was observed between chronological age and dental age estimated by Demirjian and Willems methods. Both methods can be useful in the estimation of chronological age in children.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed864    
    Printed70    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded193    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal